Prediction of Patrick Zahraj [276th] vs Juan Pablo Ficovich [157th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W L L W L
Form
W L W L W W L L W WHead-To-Head: Zahraj 0 - 0 Ficovich
| Zahraj | Stats | Ficovich |
|---|---|---|
| 61% (19-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 61% (20-13) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 276 | Ranking | 157 |
| 272 | Highest Rank | 125 |
| 25 | Age | 28 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 13 |
| 58% (131-94) | Career Total W/L | 57% (398-303) |
| $3,650 | Career Prize Money | $322,630 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Patrick Zahraj vs Juan Pablo Ficovich Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Zahraj 0 - 0 Ficovich
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zahraj has won 42.14% of points on their second serve, while Ficovich has won 45.59%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zahraj, in recent form, has won 50.4% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ficovich has won 46.51%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.51% and 26.35% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zahraj has saved 53.52% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ficovich has saved 52.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zahraj has won 58.82% of matches played (W/L 50/ 35), with Ficovich winning 58.33% (W/L 49/ 35) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zahraj has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 41/ 22), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 19/ 17). Ficovich has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 346/ 234), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Zahraj has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.42% of matches (W/L 29/ 19), where as Ficovich has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 42/ 28). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zahraj has played against opponents with an average rank of 173.12 while Ficovich has played against players with an average rank of 249.32.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zahraj has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ficovich has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zahraj has converted 33.99% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ficovich has converted 33.5% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Patrick Zahraj vs Juan Pablo Ficovich Best Odds For The Match
Patrick Zahraj Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 4-6 6-3 2-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Alvin Nicholas Tudorica
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Patrick Zahraj
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
40%
(
26 of
65)
6
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
7
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Patrick Zahraj
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
68
|
6-7(5) 5-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Felix Corwin
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jelle Sels
Player
Patrick Zahraj
73%
(
74 of
101)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
90)
8
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Arthur Fery
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Mae Malige
63%
(
69 of
110)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
7
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
44%
(
48 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
100
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Alexey Vatutin
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Patrick Zahraj
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Juan Pablo Ficovich Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Maxime Janvier
56%
(
50 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
11
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
38 of
50)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
41)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
97
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(4) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alfredo Perez
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
87)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
45%
(
19 of
42)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Rodrigo Alujas
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
57 of
84)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Juan Alejandro Hernandez
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Alejandro Hernandez
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
45%
(
37 of
82)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
17 of
45)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Zachary Svajda
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
42%
(
29 of
69)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
23 of
29)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Hugo Dellien
70%
(
81 of
115)
1st Serve %
73%
(
88 of
121)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
57 of
81)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
58 of
88)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
40 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
48 of
121)
123
Total Points Won
113
|
6-3 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Zahraj vs Ficovich?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Zahraj Vs Ficovich is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (131/94) | Win/Loss | 57% (398/303) |
| 57% (290/218) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (901/724) |
| 53% (2550/2268) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (8027/7378) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.27 |
| 750 | Aces Total | 2042 |
| 0.36 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 844 | Total Double Faults | 1224 |
| 1:26:41 | Average Match Time | 1:28:46 |
| 150.08 | Average Opponent Rank | 234.81 |
| 62% (7620/12281) | 1st Serve % | 62% (25725/41742) |
| 68% (5203/7620) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (17475/25725) |
| 45% (2079/4661) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (8154/16017) |
| 43% (600/1389) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1825/4404) |
| 42% (5314/12518) | Return Points Win % | 41% (17268/42562) |
| 59% (130/220) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (392/694) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 55% (32/58) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (98/206) |
| 54% (33/61) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (117/227) |
| 86% (130/112) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (395/333) |
| 13% (130/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (395/62) |
| 20% (95/19) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (305/62) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
